Manufacturing Technology 2021, 21(1):124-131 | DOI: 10.21062/mft.2021.019

Consistent Maintenance Management Model: Results of changes of maintenance organisation structure and processes

Jan Sailer1, Tomáš Hladík2
1 Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic

A number of asset management models, methodologies and tools are available and well known today. How-ever, various organizational approaches to asset management processes are adopted by companies in the industry. In the paper, a number of examples of maintenance process models are summarized and a comparison of examples (benchmark) of real maintenance organizational structures is presented. The used examples origin from chemical, petrochemical and automotive industries. On this background, a case study of major maintenance organization change in Unipetrol, a central European refinery and petrochemical group (part of PKN Orlen) is presented and analysed. The goal of the implemented changes in the company was to increase the overall efficiency of the maintenance organization, mainly in the areas of management, and to achieve the set KPIs. Organizational changes were implemented on the basis of a model of a close connection between maintenance and production organizations in the form of a Multi-profession production team, named “Facility team”. The changes in the organisational structure and asset management processes described in the paper had finally a significant impact on the number of management positions (reduction by 25%), roles, competencies and asset management process flow. The quantitative impacts to KPIs in areas fulfilment of process safety requirements and efficiency, after implementation this changes, it had a positive effect in the horizon of the coming year and are also evaluated and analyzed in the paper.

Keywords: Maintenance organization, Facility team, Maintenance KPI, Maintenance management

Received: September 18, 2020; Revised: January 15, 2021; Accepted: February 8, 2021; Prepublished online: February 10, 2021; Published: February 24, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sailer J, Hladík T. Consistent Maintenance Management Model: Results of changes of maintenance organisation structure and processes. Manufacturing Technology. 2021;21(1):124-131. doi: 10.21062/mft.2021.019.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. LEGÁT V. (2009). Asset management - moderní cesta k lepší údržbě a využití majetku.
    2. ISO 55000 (2014). Overview, principles and terminology. International Organization for Standardization.
    3. ISO 55001 (2014). Management systems - Requirements, International Organization for Standardization.
    4. FLYNN B., SCHROEDER R., SAKAKIBARA S. (1995). The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences; 26(5): 659-692. Go to original source...
    5. TIONG K. L., ZAKUAN N., SAMAN M. Z. M. (2012). Quality Management Maintenance and Practices- Technical and Non-Technical Approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012; 65(3): 688-696. Available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877042812051701/1-s2.0-S1877042812051701-main.pdf?_tid=cf5bafaa-e396-11e5-a6f7-00000aacb362&acdnat=1457267436_56e57530c80d71c58035678bdc3cd667
    6. Shell Global Solution International (2013). Introduction to Risk & Reliability Management.
    7. MOURTZIS D., VLACHOU E., MILAS N., XANTHOPOULOS A. (2016). Cloud-based approach for maintenance of machine tools and equipment based on shop-floor monitoring. Procedia CIRP 2016; 41: 655-660. Available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S2212827115011488/1-s2.0-S2212827115011488-main.pdf?_tid=6955bd92-e399-11e5-88a7-00000aacb35e&acdnat=1457268554_a1107100a41388df23e56a2c03afbc1b Go to original source...
    8. TAN W., STEEL A., TOLEMAN M. (2009). Implementing IT service management: a case study focussing on critical success factors. Journal of Computer Information Systems; 50(2): 1-12.
    9. VALESKO S. (2010). CMMS increases efficiency, cuts downtime. The National Provisione; 224(3): 20-23.
    10. NENIČKOVÁ H. (2011). Critical success factors for ITIL best practices usage. Economics and Management; 16(1); 839-844.
    11. NEWIS M. (2005). M 380 - Maintenence Management MERIT. Shell Global Solution International.
    12. POLOUČEK J. (2013). Řízení změn procesů údržby.
    13. KUDA F., BERÁNKOVÁ E., SOUKUP P. (2012). Facility management in a nutshell for professionals and lay people. Olomouc: Form Solution. 978-80-905257-0-2
    14. LEGÁT V. (2009). Plánování zdrojů v údržbě a jejich optimalizace.
    15. WIREMAN T. (2004). Benchmarking best practices in maintenance management. Industrial Press.
    16. ČSN EN 15341 (2010). Údržba - Klíčové indikátory výkonnosti údržby. ÚNMZ.
    17. ABREU J., MATINS P. V., FERNANDES S., ZACARIAS M. (2013). Business Processes Improvement on Maintenance Management: Case Study. Procedia Technology 2013; 9: 320-330. Available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S2212017313001904/1-s2.0-S2212017313001904-main.pdf?_tid=2a5502a6-e394-11e5-9a4f-00000aab0f26&acdnat=1457266301_f1f8be8b0840ac887f5676c1ad08ebe9 Go to original source...
    18. ČSN EN: 15341 (2007). Maintenance Key Performance Indicators.
    19. EFNMS Working Group 7 (2002) Benchmarking Definitions and Indicators.
    20. KAHN J., SVANTESSON T. (2012). Maintenance and Reliability Indicator Harmonization Project. EFNMS and SMRP.
    21. KAHN J., SVANTESSON T., OLIVER R., SANTINI F. (2008). Global Maintenance and Reliability Indicators - Fitting the Pieces Together, 1^st edition, EFNMS and SMRP.
    22. WILSON A. (2013). Asset Management, focusing on developing maintenance strategies and improving performance. Conference Communication; pp 162.
    23. YOUNUS J., FAHAD M., KHAN M. A. (2016). Evaluation and benchmarking of maintenance organization and planning/scheduling at automotive industries of Pakistan. Procedia CIRP 2016; 40: 712-716. Available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S2212827116001748/1-s2.0-S2212827116001748-main.pdf?_tid=9faa4610-e3a8-11e5-8224-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1457275087_d2820f85144a16a2a7f5c59102e4b262 Go to original source...
    24. MARCIANO P. (2013). Cukr a bič nefungují.
    25. MAYNARD H. Z. (2001). Maynard's industrial engineering handbook. McGraw-Hill Professional. pp 2248-2250.
    26. ZAAL T. (2011). Profit-Driven Maintenance for Physical Assets. Maj Engineering Publishing. pp 216-220.
    27. WILSON A. (2013). Asset Management, focusing on developing maintenance strategies and improving performance. Conference Communication; pp 621-623.
    28. LEGÁT V. a kol. (2013). Management a inženýrství údržby. Professional Publishing, Pp 51-57.
    29. TERINGL A., ALEŠ Z., LEGÁT V. (2015). Dependability Characteristic - Indicators for Maintenance, Performance Measurement of Manufacturing Technology. In: Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 15. Go to original source...
    30. LEGÁT V., ALEŠ Z., HLADÍK T. (2017). Maintenance Audit: the Tool for Maintenance Management Quality of Manufacturing Equipment. In: Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 17, ISSN 1213-2489. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content